IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE OATEO THIS THE 26?" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA A WRIT PETITION NO.21O5G/ZOIOFQMEEACPC)1*. BETWEEN: RLAKSHMIPATHY S/O LATE K.V.RA3APPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ANNASAGARA VILLAGE, .. - KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, _ ' BANGARPET TALUK. I : ' E' "'.';';PETITIONER (BY SR1 K, RAG!-iAVE|,\}D*R_"/V3,»'&_tRAC'3,, ' Q AND: 1. MALLAPALLI MuA1ISw_AM'If=_ " S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA', ' AGED ABOUT 7o'~rEARS.,',*-- . R/AT AN,r§A'SAGAPVA""VILLAGE, ,_v*"I<*er.ASAM._EIAL,_L1r:.oEsLI, ---------- 'vBA:$IG,ARPET'TALuag_. 2. NAGATAAI " S/O M.U'F€ISWAf9f}' AGED A-BOUT AMEARS, R,/AT ANNASAGARA VILLAGE, 'IKYASAMBALLEI HOBLI, I - S'ANGAR,PET"TALuK. ...RESPONDENTS
‘ *'{“EYEfS’RI .?§.G.CHANDRA MOHAN, ADV.)
THIS WRIT PETITION ES FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAY.:N:§-«.._Tov
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY Tn.El’_:’.’LE’A.’gNE0i._.TI.
PRL.CI\/IL JUDGE (SR.Dl\i.) AND JMFC, l{:G.F. INFivi;AIN.O}’1}2«0’10oo:it ‘~
DATED 10.06.2010, FOUND AT ANNEx:oRE:—aifi. ” ” 4
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR”vER’ELIMIN.A_Fx”+.iEAF<fNG'
IN '0 GROUP' THIS DAY, THE COUF?.T"'MADEv.T'H.E F.OL_LO'w'I"N'G'§I
Mallapaili .1 in this writ
petition, has filed;" Civil }udge
(Jr. Dn.) and his mother
Smt. t'he…r:§'elief of declaration and
injuncti'o.n.'~ the said suit have filed the
written staVtie{hent§ ._Tw.o" aioplications were filed in the suit
by plaintiff'Se-eig_i_n_gitemporary injunction ie, one with
regard to'ailiEenati_on and another with regard to possession.
Writtwn and statements of objections were filed
[to both tt1Ve.Va.V;3plications. The Trial Court allowed I.A.2. and
::ihasi—._.paSSsed an order of injuncgon restraining the
f,,/'
f,…
defendants from alienating the suit property. However,
the Trial Court did not find merit in I.A.3 seeking
temporary injunction against the defenda,n.ts’_A».tfi§o;rn’._
interfering with the possession and
plaintiff over the suit property ;”and:’.’_’p’asse.d”an
dismissing the said app|ication._go’nV_17.i”2,Q9_Qsnn’ex’ure5C).
Aggrieved, the plaintiff __has fi|Ved:VVV:iV3v.A’;’?,/1()..in–t.he_.t§ourt of
the Civil Budge (Sr.DnV.j”‘a”§.,;<';.gv.¢?:} .the_Vsaid appeal is
still pending. V V
2- ".¢'i¢i'itiy "*'.y_5w':i'~':"'VVV'fi|ed o.s.1s5/09
against,the of Civil Judge (3r.
Dn.), permanent injunction in
respect of”th_e He had filed I.A.1 seeking
___order};ovf*temp’o’rary ____ _injunction. Respondents herein /
def’er_ida.ntsy ‘have. filed written statement and statement of
oE>jiect’iovvnsAV’é.t’o. application. The Trial Court by its order
~V dated ..1’i?,V1’2:O9, allowed I.A.1 and passed an order of
luv'”fteirriporavry injunction (Annexure-A) restraining the
— re-spondents / defendants from interfering with possession
W2′
being filed by the appeiiant, M./A. 3/10 be preponjedj to
4/12/10 and both the appeals shali btewtaken V.
4/12/10 and further order passed. in
Contentions of both parti:es""arefi
consideration. V I V
The appeals shall be by beiow 'V
before 18/12/10. i i ii
Writ petition stand'sJa_i|'owed
sale
sac*