High Court Kerala High Court

R.M. Parameswaran vs State Of Kerala on 26 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
R.M. Parameswaran vs State Of Kerala on 26 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 10700 of 2006(W)


1. R.M. PARAMESWARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR

 Dated :26/09/2008

 O R D E R
                      K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J.

                    -----------------------------------------

                    W.P.(C) NO. 10700 OF 2006-W

                    -----------------------------------------

                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the President of a Charitable Society, formed,

inter alia, for the welfare of autorickshaw drivers. Many of the

nationalized Banks have come forward to extend loans to its members

to purchase autorickshaws. But, because of the limitation of

autorickshaw permits in the three cities, namely, Kozhikode, Kochi and

Thiruvananthapuram, further permits cannot be granted. The members

of the petitioner’s Society are aggrieved by the limitation imposed by

the Government. So, the petitioner filed Ext.P1 representation before

the Government and other authorities. During the pendency of the writ

petition the petitioner also filed Ext.P2 representation, praying to

enhance the limit already fixed, so that some additional permits could

be granted to autorickshaws. In this writ petition the petitioner has

filed a petition to amend the writ petition, incorporating a further

prayer to consider and dispose of Ext.P2.

2. In the counter affidavit filed by the State, it has admitted the

WPC 10700/06 2

receipt and pendency of Ext.P2 representation of the petitioner. In

view of the above position, the petitioner prays, the 1st respondent may

be directed to dispose of that representation expeditiously.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader for the respondents

also. If Ext.P2 is even now pending, the 1st respondent may consider

and take a decision on the request made therein in accordance with law

within four months from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

26th September, 2008. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.

Nm/