R.Meenakshi vs The Authorised Officer on 14 November, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                              
                      DATED : 14/11/2007
                              
                            CORAM
                              
            THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
                              
                Writ Petition No.9642 of 1999
                              



R.Meenakshi            				..Petitioner.


          Versus

                              
1.  The Authorised Officer
    (Land Reforms)
    Thiruchirappalli.

2.  State of Tamil Nadu
    Represented by the District Collector
    Thiruchirappalli.

3.  The Assistant Commissioner
    Land Reforms
    Thiruchirappalli.   			..Respondents.




Prayer:   This writ petition is filed under Article  226  of
the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ
of  declaration, declaring that the amendment brought  about
to  Section 22 of the Main Act (by Section 4 of the  Amended
Act  11/1996) inserting Sub section (2) to Section 22 of the
Act   is  wholly  unconstitutional  and  ultravires  of  the
provisions  of  the  Constitution and  consequently  invalid
liable  to  struck  down  in so far  as  the  petitioner  is
concerned.



      For petitioner         :  No Appearance

     For respondents         :  Mr.V.Manoharan, Government Advocate (R1 to R3)




                          O R D E R

This petition has been listed under the caption “For

Dismissal”, since there was no representation on behalf of

the petitioner, on an earlier occasion, i.e., on 13.11.2007.

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the

petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution. No costs.

csh

To

1. The Authorised Officer
(Land Reforms)
Thiruchirappalli.

2. The District Collector
Thiruchirappalli.

3. The Assistant Commissioner
Land Reforms
Thiruchirappalli.