Loading...
Responsive image

R.Padmakumar vs Director on 15 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
R.Padmakumar vs Director on 15 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 21398 of 2009(T)


1. R.PADMAKUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DIRECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR,

3. THE STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.I.ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :15/12/2009

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      W.P.(C)No. 21398 OF 2009
         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
             Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009

                               JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner is in relation to Ext.P2 final

seniority list of Upper Division Clerks. On publication of Ext.P2

seniority list and being aggrieved, petitioner submitted Ext.P3

representation highlighting his grievances. It is stated that on

receipt of Ext.P3, the 2nd respondent forwarded the representation

to the 1st respondent with his recommendations. There has not

been any further action in the matter and hence, the writ petition.

2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions in

the matter and submits that after publication of Ext.P2 final

seniority list, several complaints were received and that the whole

issue is pending consideration of the 1st respondent.

Thus it is obvious that several complaints were received

against Ext.P2 and that the entire matter is pending before the 1st

respondent. Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is

disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass

orders on the complaints received against Ext.P2 with notice to

WPC : 21398 of 2009
-:2:-

the aggrieved parties. This shall be done as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy

of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ttb

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information