High Court Kerala High Court

R.Rajan vs The Director Of Public … on 6 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
R.Rajan vs The Director Of Public … on 6 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27954 of 2009(L)


1. R.RAJAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOLLAM.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

5. M.N.SUMANGALA, HEADMISTRESS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.ANILKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :06/10/2009

 O R D E R
                   T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                        W.P.(C). No.27954/2009-L
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioner herein retired from service voluntarily as a Peon. He

applied for V.R.S on 17/03/2008 and the same was granted by order dated

17/06/2008. It is the case of the petitioner that the Headmistress of the

school delayed the forwarding of the pension papers for one year

irrespective of repeated demands made by the petitioner, which resulted in

gross delay in disbursement of the pensionary benefits to the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has explained in paragraph (3) of the writ

petition the circumstances under which the petitioner had to avail V.R.S.

His wife is a handicapped lady who is undergoing treatment. His aged

mother is also being looked after by him and she had undergone two

surgeries recently.

3. The petitioner claims payment of interest for the delayed

payment of the retiral benefits. Ext.P10 is a detailed representation

preferred by the petitioner before the Director of Public Instructions. The

petitioner prays that Ext.P10 may be directed to be considered by the first

respondent within a specific time frame.

W.P.(C). No.27954/2009
-:2:-

4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the

grievance raised by the petitioner in Ext.P10 after calling for appropriate

reports in the matter from the officers concerned. Appropriate orders shall

be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms