High Court Kerala High Court

R.S.Goutham vs Commercial Tax Inspector on 21 May, 2008

Kerala High Court
R.S.Goutham vs Commercial Tax Inspector on 21 May, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14465 of 2008(V)


1. R.S.GOUTHAM, ZONAL MANAGER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,

3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

4. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :21/05/2008

 O R D E R
                                    K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                             WP.(C) No.14465 of 2008
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                        Dated this the 21st day of May, 2008

                                       JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges Ext.P10. Ext.P10 is a notice issued under

Section 47(2) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 affording an

opportunity to show cause against the detention of the vehicle. The reason

stated is as follows:

“As per the invoice attached the goods are sold by

Parcomm Hydraulic Pvt. Ltd, Kolkotta to Revathi Equipments

Ltd, Pollachi Road, Malumachampatty, Coimbatore. But the

goods are transported to Ernakulam. There are no valid

documents accompanied with transport of goods to Ernakulam.”

2. Heard learned Government Pleader also.

3. According to the petitioner the goods were actually to be

consigned to the consignee stationed in Coimbatore and it is only by a

mistake committed in the office that it strayed into the Kerala area. Learned

counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will file an objection to

Ext.P10.

4. I am not inclined to interfere with Ext.P10. But I am

inclined to direct that a decision will be taken on the objection to be filed by

the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the objection

WPC. 14465/2008. 2

will be filed along with the copy of the judgment. A decision will be taken

on the objection to be filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a

period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the objection. Petitioner or

his representative will be afforded an opportunity of hearing before a final

decision is taken.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sb