High Court Kerala High Court

R.Salimkumar vs Secretary To Government on 14 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
R.Salimkumar vs Secretary To Government on 14 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 5652 of 2008(W)


1. R.SALIMKUMAR, S/O.RAGHAVAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL
                       ...       Respondent

2. REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.RAVIKUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :14/10/2008

 O R D E R
                           ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                         ===============
                     W.P.(C) NO. 5652 OF 2008 (W)
                    ====================

               Dated this the 14th day of October, 2008

                              J U D G M E N T

Petitioner has retired from the service on 31/5/2007 while he was

working as Deputy Director of Higher Secondary Education.

2. In this writ petition, he mainly complains that his DCRG and

Earned Leave Surrender benefit have not been released so far. The reason

for not releasing the aforesaid retirement benefits is the pendency of a

disciplinary action initiated by Exts. P1 and P2 and parties are in

agreement that the enquiry has not been completed so far.

3. Therefore, at this stage, what is appropriate is to direct

completion of the enquiry initiated against the petitioner by Exts. P1 and

P2 on an expeditious basis.

4. Therefore, I direct that the 1st respondent shall ensure that the

enquiry initiated against the petitioner following Exts. P1 and P2 shall be

continued and completed, at any rate within 6 months of receipt of a copy

of this judgment. Thereafter, depending upon the outcome of the

proceedings, claim of the petitioner for the aforesaid benefits shall be

WPC 5652/08
:2 :

considered and orders passed without delay.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st

respondent for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp