IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 6661 of 2010(G)
1. R.SASIDHARAN PILLAI, S/O.RAGHAVAN PILLAI
... Petitioner
2. M.VENUGOPALAN NAIR, S/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND
3. THE SUPERINTENDENTING ENGINEER,
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
For Petitioner :SRI.B.MOHANLAL
For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :06/08/2010
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.6661 OF 2010(G)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of August, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Petitioners’ grievance is regarding exclusion of their names
from Ext.P4 seniority list. According to the petitioners, they are CLR
workers working in the Kallada Irrigation Project. When a seniority
list was proposed to be prepared and finalized they submitted
Ext.P2 and P2(a) representations seeking their inclusion in the
seniority list. However, their names were not included and it is
complained that their juniors were included. It is with this grievance
this writ petition is filed.
2. Learned Government Pleader obtained instructions in the
matter and submits that it was for the reason that the petitioners
did not submit required details that they were not included in Ext.P4
seniority list. it is stated that subsequently details were obtained
and it is proposed to include their names in the revised seniority
list.
3. Now that a decision in favour of the petitioners to include
them in the revised seniority list has been taken by the respondents,
WPC.No.6661 /2010
:2 :
all that is necessary is that the respondents should implement the
said decision and include the name of the petitioners in the
seniority list to be revised. With that direction the writ petition is
disposed of .
Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd
respondent for taking appropriate action.
(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/