R Savithramma vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd on 3 February, 2009

HIGH coca': LEGAL ssrzvzcss commas, BANGALQ§§§'..V_
% serous THE LOX Ammr "  %

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BA~G§e;L:)gL=% T    

omen 'nus THE 3*" DAY or  'A
CONCILIATORSV.PF?5ESEm;':'    % 1 % % "
nou'aL£ mz..Jus'r1cE s.u.sxrHvAflAa4§¥Ama

SR1.N.s.sAMPANG:~%RA;M;§1Afi;% muses

 

SMT.R.SAVITHRAMMA, wio.L:9«T§; R.w'=.GAR'A]AIYE'R, 
AGED ABOUT 64 vEA1z.ss;,, sc:...30, 2¥€P,.sr.aez3, « 
41"" amcx, v.c;.r«w maqvzswammcgaa, _
fiA£\iGALORE~«?9.  _ .     * -

V A A _  APPSLLAHT
(av s§r.sH%ai!s§k¥AJ%§a_frr§Au, ADVGCATE)

A312: _ %
1.

me HEW»I?§jDIA’ASSURAN€E.__CQ’.LTD.,
:3»: H3 MJ3.NAG–ER, mas,
ESHWRRI cosmr-m<, 'DRRAIKUMAR ROAD,

RAIFU – 21.

e } SMT.SOUBHAGYA, .§v1c:=.RAMAKR15HnAzAH,
‘«¢.:.c;E13 rwoa, ¥§J0.P3f1.55, IT” caoss,
J.C.NAGAR; MAHMfitK5HMIPUR.N*1,
BANGALORE 7-35.: .. aespouarearrs

‘4 V’ * ,,(a’r’.su:V{‘s.v.HaeaE nwLmAx.:>, ADVOCATE son :11)

“” MFA F1’..LED”UlS.1?3{1) OF MV ACT fieGAIMiST THE IUQGMENT AHD AWARE)
%’¥ATE55* .26′-’12*~.2005 PASSEB IN MVC N0.212}’I2fi05 095 THE FILE QF T85 ¥4ACT-V,

–._<;"{}UR"§" $9-'}Ai.E. CNJSES, EMIGALORE, PART?! ALLQWING THE CLAIM F*ETI'TION
¥"f}'¥%.– COM'?£NSaATIO§3 A390 SEEKING ENHAf:ICEMENT OF COMPEHSATION.

APPEAL comma on FOR couczmnou BEFORE Lox ADALAT AFTER
BEING REFERRED, ms FDLLOWIIGG ORDER IS PASSE9.