High Court Kerala High Court

R.Sudha vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 9 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
R.Sudha vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 9 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 28424 of 2009(W)


1. R.SUDHA, INDUSTRIAL SUPERVISOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTORATE OF SCHEDULED TRIBE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :09/10/2009

 O R D E R
                             V.GIRI,J.
                       -------------------------
                   W.P ( C) No.28424 of 2009
                      --------------------------
                Dated this the 9th October,2009

                        J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is working as Industrial Supervisor in

I.T.D.P. She had joined as Instructor on advice by the

Public Service Commission. Thereafter, she was promoted

to the post of Supervisor and still further to the post of

Industrial Supervisor with effect from 19.7.1993. The

writ petitioner refers to the services of another Industrial

Supervisor one Sri.J.Valsan and according to the

petitioner there were only two posts of Industrial

Supervisors going by Ext.P2. 25 Training Centres come

under these two Industrial Supervisors and one of the

Industrial Supervisors will be in charge of the southern

zone consisting of Districts from Thiruvananthapuram to

Ernakulam. and the other in charge of the North zone

from Thrissur to Kasargod. Going by Ext.P2, the post

held by Sri.J.Valsan was upgraded to that of a Training

Officer. He has retired on 31.3.2009.

2. Petitioner contends that she came to know of

Ext.P2 order only in August 2009. It is not clear whether

W.P ( C) No.28424 of 2009
2

Sri.Valsan was qualified for the post of Training officer.

But nevertheless Ext.P2 shows that his post was upgraded.

Petitioner contends that she is the senior-most Industrial

Supervisor. Pursuant to the retirement of Sri.J.Valsan, she

was the only person working as Industrial Supervisor.

3. Learned Government Pleader submits that since

the petitioner is not qualified in terms of the Special Rules

she cannot be considered for the post of Training Officer.

4. The basis on which Ext.P2 was issued upgrading

the post is not clear. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the post of Training Officer is not

comprehended by the Special Rules for the service and it is

therefore that by Ext.P2 Executive Order the post of

Industrial Supervisor was merely upgraded.

5. Learned Government Pleader submits that

Ext.P4 Gradation List shows that incumbent of the post

which was upgraded as per Ext.P2 nevertheless had an I.T.I

Certificate

6. Ext.P2, as stated above, does not show the basis

as such for upgrading the post. The fact that it had been

W.P ( C) No.28424 of 2009
3

upgraded is not disputed. Petitioner has been continuing in

the post of Industrial Supervisor since 1993. If the post of

Training Officer, which is one that came into existence as

per Ext.P2 is not comprehended by the Special Rules but

nevertheless it is sought to be filled up, then petitioner’s

claim, as contained in Ext.P3 shall be considered before

the Government takes a decision in that regard.

7. Accordingly Ext.P3 shall be considered and a

decision taken thereon by the 1st respondent, before the

Government takes a decision in the matter of appointment

to the post of Training Officer, that came into existence on

the retirement of Sri. J.Valsan on 31.3.2009. The 1st

respondent shall see that the post is filled up, only in

accordance with law.

A copy of the writ petition shall be produced before

the 1st respondent by the petitioner and it is open to him

to file a supplementary representation also.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No.28424 of 2009
4

W.P ( C) No.28424 of 2009
5