R Venkatesham Chetty S/O Rangaiah … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 July, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,   1'  

DATED THIS THE 131' DA'? O1if;m3;y,L: K  'A 

BEFORE   

THE HON'BLE MR.   REOOY
WRIT PETrr1O:»zNOO;§g$f:*~AOF;23O_Oo6  

BETWEEN

1 R  £3HIi)'I'I'Y Sf4.')..RANGAIAH
CHE'17FY',44_A1.'},!?,iD'.4gE3OI)T--._83 ms
PRO5~s21ET9R  MOTOR
SERVICE. O:ANOHmAOAR3

   ~ O  PE'I'I'I'IONER.

(By ':i8§»O.nA;.'SRII<ANTH, ADVS.)

O kf; O    S'I'A'I'E TRANSPORT AU'I'I~IORI'I'Y

 V"MjS..VBUi'I.I}ING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
OrBAr¢OAO:;ORE BY rm sac

2  AN£)HRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION

 ~ : % BY ITS MI) MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD
. _fANDHRAPRADESH

"    KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT

CORPORATION, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
CENTRAL OFFICES, KENGAL HANUMA 

ROAD, BANGALORE 27.  RESPONDENTS.

(By Smt: M.C. AKKAMAHADEVI, HCGP FOR R1,}:
\;’

SR1. S. PRAKASH SI~IETTY, ADV. FOR R2,
SRI. K. NAGARAJ, ADV. FOR R3)

THIS ‘WRIT PE’I’I’I’IC)N IS UNQER * x
226 AND 227 are THE CONSTI’I”U’I_’IsONg O’Ii’ INDIA”.
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERBY THE-. KSTAT 13¢

APPEALS No.42′?/04, 322, 32312305

VIDE ANN~D. ‘-

THIS PE’I’I’l’ION, comma .V ()1′.~Iu F612 ‘._VPRV}3:L1IMmARY
HEARING IN ‘B’GROIJ’1-if’, mas D AY”‘I’_I._-IE MADE

petiticma’ submits the
the . If that is so, the

“” Petition stanzis dismissed’ w

Sd/~
Judge