High Court Kerala High Court

Radha.K vs The Managing Director on 13 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
Radha.K vs The Managing Director on 13 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1272 of 2009(B)


1. RADHA.K, TYPIST/CLERK, KAMCO, ATHANI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :13/01/2009

 O R D E R
                        T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         W.P.(C). No.1272/2009-B
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is working as Typist-Clerk under the second

respondent. She was appointed on 16/08/2000. The appointment was

through Employment Exchange. Initially, it was for a period of one year

and, after one year of service, she was asked to continue on daily wages and

still she is continuing. Now she is of the age 46 and the chances for getting

any other employment is too remote. The petitioner is the only sole bread-

winner of the family as her husband is physically handicapped person. It is

stated that they do not have any own residence or any property.

2. Seeking for regularisation of her service, she has moved the

first respondent as per Ext.P4. The learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the first respondent may be directed to consider Ext.P4 and

pass appropriate orders.

3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also.

There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 in

W.P.(C) No.1272/2009
-:2:-

accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in the matter within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

As the petitioner has been continuing on temporary engagement, she may

not be relieved for accommodating fresh temporary hands.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms