High Court Kerala High Court

Radhakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Radhakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6515 of 2009()


1. RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 39 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. PRADEEP B., AGED 31 YEARS,
3. SATHEESAN M.N., AGED 39 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.PADMAKUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :30/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 6515 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
           Dated this the 30th day of November, 2009

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused

Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No.686/2009 of Pandalam Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 452, 294(b), 427, 354 and 324 read with Section 34 of

the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

16.11.2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned

counsel for the petitioners and the learned

Public Prosecutor, I am of the view that

before disposing of the Bail Application, an

opportunity should be given to the

petitioners to appear before the

investigating officer. Accordingly, there

will be a direction to the petitioners to

appear before the investigating officer at

9 A.M. on 23rd and 24th November, 2009.

Post on 30.11.2009.

B.A. No. 6515 of 2009 2

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioners will not be

arrested until further orders in connection

with Crime No.686/2009 of Pandalam

Police Station.

The petitioners shall produce a copy

of the order before the investigating

officer.

Hand over copy to both sides.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioners have

complied with the direction contained in the order dated

16.11.2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

them on bail on their executing bond for Rs.10,000/- each with

two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

B.A. No. 6515 of 2009 3

A) The petitioners shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11 A.M.
on alternate Mondays, till the final report is filed
or until further orders;

B) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

C) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

E) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln