Rafique Ahamed Patil vs Nisar Mehboob Shaikh S/O Mehaboob … on 21 August, 2009

Cr1.P.No.?550/2999

IN THE HIGH COURT 01? KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAI} _
DATED THIS THE 21st DAY or AUGUST, 2oo_9VV_j
BEFORE ' V

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE HULHVADI .G;R.§1§§:EdS§~I'-AV  1'

CRXMINALHPETITION N§.,755o/rf2ooéA..'  

Between:

Rafique Aharned Patil
Agezlvlajor, OCc:Ac£vocate, 
S / o Abdul Karim Patil '  ._
R/o H.No.83, Market Street, VA 
Carr1p--Be1gaum. '

(BY      

And:

Nisar Mehboob  rd' V4" --- 
Age:42 years ," *QCC,§B1iSiI'1:3S'Sw,' 
S / o Mehboob Shaikh.,V'* ' '

 Plot No;-'C196; 11 Main, r

A"Be1gau_m._vv  -.

7*". Crests, iR:,/ o"t--SadashiV"'NVagar,
'* RESPONDENT

(Buf~_Si*i,HLoke’sJ; Jfiaiewlli, Adv}

This’–v.I5e’tition is filed under section A82 Cr.P.C. by the

~ advocate”for1. the petitioner praying that this Hon’bIe Court may
_ “be pleased to quash the order of the trial Court dated
” ‘2a1}{)4.2’OO8 in C.C.No.775/2008 (PC744/2007) before the
_ _J_MF?’C’ ‘Court III Court Belgaurn in taking cognizance of the
…_”eomi§3laint and dismiss the complaint.

l.,l’E.l’.l’i(). IDDUIAUUV

notice is served or not. However, now the petitioner is ready to
make payments. The learned Magistrate has to take lenient

view so far as the petitioner is concerned and extenci

reasonable time to the petitioner and see that the

settled. With the above observations, this petitiosi V’

of. –

at

Jm/~