High Court Karnataka High Court

Raghava Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Raghava Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 January, 2010
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
l\?I'l 'in\lIJI\l \.fI" [um
""*""'""'-H "MN Ltguagu ur Mucnnmnn mu:-1 uuum ur nflnnnlnnn ru\:n'u ............

I

IN THE HIGH CGJRT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE

DAJPED THIS THE mm DAY or JANUARY, 2om %j%Lk

BEFQRE

mm HGWBLE mm. JUSTICE ASHOKB.   w %  

wnrr PETITION He.15589%¥l?1=:2§o4j£1¥Rj% 7

2. uumasnm g k
3:0 k %
mm

nc>.33,si1*mcm1iIt’ M ‘
UmImmLu£;&nw’mm? ‘ …Pm*rr1oxE1’vz

mv., mR
% _ Sm mm, wv.,)

“IIVII V-Iwwiwuul ‘I-uvl I\r”II\l’r’\lr’|I\l”‘I IIIVJII ‘IutlaI\- Vii II”II\I’I”lII’l.OIl’l I

2

3. SET KKRKU FO€3z.3§%
W19 HHQIYA m0JARY
HAJOR
N033. BHEOOR VILIAGE
§flIB P08′?


VIA EAREIR

unmrz mmx as nmmcrr   _ T'    A 

(BY:SRI B.r2.mAsANxA,mx?., * k Y

M] s.M.RAnm1»m’r & mas:-“mm. ._AS8TS. _
SR1 RAMACHANDRA R.H.a.nN IS FIi’.E D_UN£)E:R ‘ARTICLES
ms mm 227 c~:34V«1=a.s%s.k::f;:A%A3y R2 IN 30
933 as 11′ REI..5&’I’ES:.A~’f?€J”vQF:”OC(:UPAHCY
mmrrs 01′-* frm;L1= F’ULL_’x’.. ,_..§5E’-BCIRIEED m
SGEJEHJL-A_WRj!T1-RETFFIQH ARI) 210.,

THIS ma; rmapzmcs
THIS 95?, THE FOLLOWING:

Ram” m. h -53* 1-4 R?; Hai1c, the learneti H.C.G.P. is

‘ L’ the fmpondmt Real and 2.

. ” have mlfl inm qtxmtian the ardw,

;a2.c:2%.2oo~4 K] pmea by cm swam
mapect of the lands measuring 5 sacrum 78
Tm at-mange in this peti&n is confined only m

855

IlrVulin V¢\aw.vnn- wvu .-.u..» .. _.. .-

…- nu .

” “”” ” “”-A’,.-‘-‘!”H vr” wusmnlunfl r’m.:rH LUUKI Ur KAHNAIAISH filurl uvwnt vr |\r\i\a’Iruru\r-1

3

‘A’ Scheduka lands measurkg 2 a<:1-aw 29 cams. The

petitfmzxms are the awrusrs oftha Ends in question,

2. M sh.m,m,, me ,W
appearim for Sri Amamda s1mgé%Jkr¢r~ mg;
subxmim that Hazy” ‘ £1 . ‘ ”

petifiorzmm. Hiriya Bmojarfa
tha raspondsem ma in
the Lands in qumtknn. 21¢ Poajary
mumex has the grant of
occupancy aurrmdemd his

7M1s.M,Rmbmt & smgada Assmm

five” Raj} aubmtk that s &

A rghta ‘mu false. This surrfimw fiocmaamt
xzrxeataed by the peaamm. by apmfim the
at’ Hiriya Poojaxy. Tm karned eounstzl

fi.x;rt% sixtamh that, an tha demim cf Hiriya Paojaryg
fififi

4

& with Smfiarku Paojartbzi zxmtmued to be in

%ama’r2n and occupafimn at’ the lafis in

Therefore, tim Tribunal is justfiacl in

I-i.C.G~.F. amrm for the k 2
woufl aha auppurt the
d<anm'ssa1orth*aP?'m°m'

5. of the
cm} the Tribunal. who
was lands in qumtk::1
mam’ 3; 19?-4 and mean” ‘ my

%:1§~7{§s km from the ‘1’ribuxm1’s ordar.

fer t ymra 53 mt fasrflmomm

the rm ‘l’ribuxJa1 has aniy stated that the

A .:» .:f¢;3poa:lw;t am} bar charm’ emt::nu’ ed to be in
H Efian aftbe ‘A’ fiedule Iaridfip as 13%’ rim final

records. 1% Courtfims 1:253 150 be a. tee vague

,umspedfic§’§ mmBmm%mwm

E3′?! R.UUK1 ur EAKNA ‘ . – – – – –
“WA HEW’! Lt.ft:t:.,§ wt tuumnimm mt.-an-I LUUKI ur tflnlwlnlnlu-e. ……. …..-…

5

ma Tribunal’: order. The ‘I’r&una1’a erder does not

stem as in whether tar mt firm third
husband was afive aa can the: appointed data: _
ware afive on t% aprpoinmd tints, u

tn fie Form Hm’? apphmticn.

5. The Tribunal “I§;:1.’«V_
‘ tn the A. third
rwpommfa Ra.5001.

In ma .113 W .,,, an
it was obtained
aurrmflaf wait.’ be again? rejectcd.

has an be carxsiiared ard

*2′; Far all the: &resaB wax, I quash the

tzrder imofar an it pemaim tar: petificn ‘A’
hurls. It is made elm that in rt-mpect ofthe
% 7az1m- lands, the mmpugm mam’ standa undiamrbed.

Tm’Fr’ihunalin$d1rec1:ari’bhoHars-a:1q;ui:*yit:L

|\fl’!’l hvunl vi Iwmuvnxnuum -um.» u-up-.. V. ._ -.-.

6

acoordamewitizxlawamidiaposeofthermdd

mafia’ in $11.’: months tima.

VGR