IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER :;i.OU9 BEFORE THE HON'BLE IVIR JUSTICE HULUVADIIE-_ O CRIMINAL PETITION NOfi.78Q2'AOIi'--O2tIQ9..: * 'V S O} BETWEEN: O O O A . RAGHAVENDRA <,'_ SON OF DATTATRAYA OH/«TOE. _ AGE:27YEARS 4 '. . , OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE 'AND CAGI2ICPLI'I;TU.RE R/O. 3~IO'OLv;Ii,;TAfj; PETITIONER ' O (EY 'SRI'I.C.R:."~-EATIL, ADV.,) AND: O 1' ST2ITE'~OII' KARNATAKA % BY 'ITSv--.PUBLIC~-PROSECUTOR DHARvJAD_ RESPONDENT (I_3Y SRI A.K. NAVALGIMATH, HCGP) ZTHIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439--._ CR.P.C PRAYINGTO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON gBA1.L HUBLI VIDYANAGAR PS. CR. NO.151 OF 2009 FOR _' THE ALLEGED OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 448, 307, 506 " V. .._.iF-'C, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC II COURT, HUBLI. Jéu' THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
Petitioner has sought for grant of bail
with Crime No. 151 / 2009 of Vidyanagar Polic’e”Sta’tioi1:for ” is
offences punishable 13/8 448, sol: and..5o£:{o£’ rec”
allegation that petitioner wanted to irqarry theco3’nplai;narit_:Vlu
and was following her. Thereafter, v;rhen”shle_’c’lidiV:I;1ot oblige
to marry him, having intoiithe house he is said
to have assaulted on her.:.face’ “othe’r’i_e.arts of the body
and threatened her} of d’ire”conse’quences.
_ Heard-. both thei*cio”u–nsel for the parties
to the learned counsel for the petitioner,
been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner
is appearing for BA. Examination. There is contradiction in
iithieaversion of the complainant as to the use of weapon. The
Alinjtired has been discharged from the hospital. Accordingly,
vi “sought for grant of bail.
J/V
2. It is submitted by the learned Government
Pleader that investigation has not been completed.
3. in the case on hand, as per the prosecution
story, the petitioner had developed liking
complainant. When she refused to oblige th€i’«i:\lv’O1″‘Ci–5i3:i
petitioner, petitioner said to have:’attacked.< her fam-1 caiised,
some injuries. However, what is ibein–g'noticed'~as«.
prosecution is that injured to have .];ie'efii"..;~liisChargedii'
from the hospital.
4-._ ii p In circuna_sta_nces, to enable the prosecution
to file thelcliarge -she_eiit;«.._is’ince the incident has taken place
du_;ri’ng__iithe rnonth______of June the petitioner’s case may be
‘ co’1i.sidveredffo’r.__grant of bail on or after 53″‘ October 2009,
‘subject ‘to: executing a personal bond for a sum of
Rs.ii25,(i)Q0ii/i– (Rs.’I’wentyfive thousand only) and one surety
ii iiiorgthei like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned
Jjfo-V