High Court Kerala High Court

Rahim Haji @ Rahim Hamsa vs State Of Kerala on 16 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Rahim Haji @ Rahim Hamsa vs State Of Kerala on 16 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3856 of 2008()



1. RAHIM HAJI @ RAHIM HAMSA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.BABU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :16/10/2008

 O R D E R
                              R. BASANT, J.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                Crl.M.C. Nos. 3856 & 3859 OF 2008
                 -----------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 16th day of October, 2008

                                 O R D E R

The common petitioner in these two Crl.MCs faces

indictment in two separate prosecutions both under Section 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court-II, Muvattupuzha. Cognizance has already

been taken. Accused has entered appearance and has been

enlarged on bail. He has engaged counsel also. But when the

case came up for consideration on 18.08.08 petitioner was absent.

Application was filed to adjourn the case. That was rejected. Non

bailable warrants of arrests have been issued against the

petitioner. Petitioner apprehends imminent arrest. Learned

counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely

innocent. His absence are not willful or deliberate. He is willing to

surrender. But he apprehends remand to custody if he surrenders

before the learned Magistrate. Thus the petitioner has come to

this court with the prayer that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C

may be issued to the learned Magistrate to comply with the

directions in Alice George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police

Crl.M.C. Nos. 3856 & 3859 OF 2008
-:2:-

[2003(1)KLT 339] and to consider the application for bail to be

filed by him when he surrenders before the learned Magistrate on

merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously – on the date of

surrender itself.

2. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in

Alice George (Supra). It is not necessary for this court in every

subsequent case to issue directions to the Magistracy to follow the

dictum in Alice George (Supra). Every court is bound to do the

same. I have no reason to assume that the same shall not be

done. If the directions are not complied with the avenues of

challenge/complaint are available for the petitioner.

3. In the result, this petition is dismissed subject to the

above specific observations.

Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the

petitioner for production before the learned Magistrate.

R. BASANT, JUDGE
ttb

Crl.M.C. Nos. 3856 & 3859 OF 2008
-:3:-

Crl.M.C. Nos. 3856 & 3859 OF 2008
-:4:-

Crl.M.C. Nos. 3856 & 3859 OF 2008
-:5:-