High Court Kerala High Court

Rahul Raj vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The Public on 19 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rahul Raj vs State Of Kerala Rep.By The Public on 19 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7333 of 2010()


1. RAHUL RAJ, S/O.RAJEEV,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SREERAJ.P.S., S/O.SASIDHAR,
3. NIDHIN KRISHNA, S/O.RADHAKRISHNAN,
4. VISHNU SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN,
5. LAL KRISHNA.K.G., S/O.GOPI,
6. RANJEESH.P.R., S/O.RAVI,
7. SANDEEP, S/O.SATHYAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP (SR.)

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :19/11/2010

 O R D E R
                         V.RAMKUMAR, J.
              ----------------------------------------------
               Bail Application No.7333 of 2010
             ------------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010

                                ORDER

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 7 in Crime No.964

of 2010 of Trichur West Police Station for offences punishable

under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326 & 308 read with

Section 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this

nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the

petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the

purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail

considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the

petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on

27/11/2010 or on 28/11/2010 for the purpose of interrogation

and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall

thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being

satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police

shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail

preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

This petition is disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

skj