Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.


Allahabad High Court
Raj Pal Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. on 28 January, 2010
Court No. - 45

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35472 of 2009

Petitioner :- Raj Pal Singh And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- B.K. Singh
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and AGA for the State and also
perused the record.

The main submission made by learned counsel for the applicants is that the
role of firing has been attributed to the co-accused Pushpendra @ Neetu and
hence the applicant should be enlarged on bail as he has been falsely roped in
this case.

In the FIR itself, the role of firing has been attributed to the co-accused
Pushpendra @ Neetu. Therefore, without expressing any opinion about merit
of the case, keeping in view of the facts and circumstance of the case, the
applicants may be admitted to bail.

Let the applicants Rajpal Singh and Satya Pal Singh both sons of Harbans
Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No 2069 of 2009, under sections 323,
307 IPC, P.S. Naugawan Sadat, District J.P. Nagar on their executing a
personal bond for Rs. 25,000/- and furnishing two sureties each in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Order Date :- 28.1.2010
v.k.updh.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.169 seconds.