High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Raja Kumar Gupta @ Jitendra vs The State Of Bihar on 1 June, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Raja Kumar Gupta @ Jitendra vs The State Of Bihar on 1 June, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.16874 of 2011
             RAJA KUMAR GUPTA @ JITENDRA , Son of Saral Prasad
             Gupta, resident of Village-Pani Tanki, Dhantolia, P.S.-Dehri,
             District-Rohtas at Sasaram.
                                              Versus
                                    THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                           -----------

2. 01.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered

under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The truck of the informant was stolen. Amar

Nath promised to search the truck. The informant paid

one and a half lakhs to Amar Nath. Recovery was also

made from the house of Amar Nath. The role assigned to

the petitioner is that his mobile was used in the

occurrence, on the basis of which he is also said to be

involved in the said occurrence. The petitioner is in

custody since 28.03.2011

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner

namely, Raja Kumar Gupta @ Jitendra be released on

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at

Sasaram in connection with Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No.

157 of 2011 subject to the following conditions.

(a) Both the bailors should be family members of

the petitioner;

2

(b) The attested photographs of the bailors

should be affixed on the bail bonds;

(c) The bailors will given an undertaking in

writing that they will be responsible for producing the

petitioner during the proceedings of the case;

(d) The petitioner shall remain physically present

before the Court below on each and every date fixed in

the case and on his absence even for a single date

without an explanation to the satisfaction of the Court

below, the Court below will be at liberty to take action not

only against the petitioner but also against the bailors.

Anand Kr.                                        ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)