IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA No. 1305 of 2007()
1. RAJAN CASHEW COMPANY,REP.BY ITS
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,REP.BY
... Respondent
2. KERALA STATE ELETICITY REGULATORY
3. THE ASST.EXECUUTIVE ENGINEER,MAJOR SECTI
For Petitioner :SMT.S.KARTHIKA
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN
Dated :12/06/2007
O R D E R
H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.
...................................................................................
W.A. No. 1305 OF 2007
...................................................................................
Dated this the 12th June, 2007
J U D G M E N T
H.L. Dattu, C.J.:
Questioning the correctness or otherwise of the judgment
delivered by the learned single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 25066 of 2006
dated 19th March 2007, the petitioner in the Writ Petition has filed this
Appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant, Shri M.R. Anison would
submit that the learned single Judge, without quashing Ext.P3 issued by
the respondents, ought not to have directed the second respondent to re-
hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders with regard to the
applicability or otherwise of LT-IV tariff instead of LT-VII(A) tariff.
3. In our view, the apprehension of the petitioner is
misconceived. The learned single Judge, after noticing that an order has
been passed by the respondents without complying with the orders and
directions issued by this court, has stated that the petitioner is not bound
by the orders passed by the respondents by Ext.P3. That only means
that the learned single Judge has prevented the authorities from
W.A. No. 1305 OF 2007
2
enforcing Ext.P3 order against the petitioner.
4. In that view of the matter, we do not see any error in the
impugned judgment. Therefore, no interference is called for in this Writ
Appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
H.L. DATTU,
CHIEF JUSTICE.
K.T. SANKARAN,
JUDGE.
lk