Rajappa vs State Of Karnataka on 15 January, 2009

E
Q
u
E
E?
E
R
§
2
S

 

M... u2MaIuw;i\\nflf"%!I%dl"'\R xswzwnwurfla wwwwa WM %"¢z£"'iE'&flW#'&xfEt.9*"QN'%.fi"1 E1357?" Euhfilfiififi     

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 15" DRY OF JANUARY zcaéaf;

BEFORE _, ,R_
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ARRNnRvf»i

CRIMINAL pETIT1oN.No.5Q89}2QbsU'x'f*V'

BETWEEN

RRJRPRA
s/0 GOVINDAPPA
LAKKUR VILLAGE,
MRLUR PO

KGLAR DISTRICT 

AND :

1 STATE QR KARNATAKA " 
.REP_BY.ITSgSUB¢INSPECTOR OF POLICE
aKADUG0uxWR0L1c£a$TAI:oN
xMmmm1§_'R,*
aRNGALoRg'560'05?~"

v1KAAs'RgARWAL
" SfO»ISHWARDRS AGARWAL
.3 BELATHUR VILLAGE

' 'KADUGQD§ 90
&'KADUGQDf

BANGRLORE 560 067

T N.

x§SHWARDAS AGARWAL
s/0 AGARWAL

._ BELATHUR VILLAGE
3 KADUGODI 90
KADUGODI
BANGALORE 560 067

4 SENNA NAYAK
s/0 KRISHNA NRYRK
BELATHUR VILLAGE,
KADUGODI PO
KADUGODI
BANGRLQRR 560 067



- - - - ' KA HJGH COM?
mwxmsm mun Lmum Q? KARMATA
__ ____m _._.,.... 1313.'! T' "r""'r"r"w' '-"wt-I %W*W WI'     "A

,MbrCh 2005 P.S. City Sonepat and all "=_

consequentlproceedings."

4. In the case on hand, parties

their dispute in terms of compromise fleed defied I

27.10.2008

.

person one and no public, policy’ is Xin§olved.

Therefore, no useful purpose wofilo be eer§ed by
continuing criminal pfooeedifigs. ‘.*

5. In,£he gesuit. the imppgned proceedings

are quashed; The petition”i$_acoepted.

Sd/’:.

Judge

mv*

.heVeysettled_u

It is seen that oiepute is fifirelf}e”

‘sag Q raga.” ta u..J\xv….rrnxx…u..-m