High Court Kerala High Court

Rajeena Ibrahim vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rajeena Ibrahim vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 1764 of 2010()


1. RAJEENA IBRAHIM, W/O.NASIR IBRAHIM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :07/04/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 1764 of 2010
                ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010

                             O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused

No.1 in Crime No.910/2009 of Nemom Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

29/03/2010, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, I am of

the view that before disposing of the Bail

Application, an opportunity should be given to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating officer.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating officer

at 9 A.M. on 2nd and 3rd April, 2010. The petitioner

shall produce a copy of the order before the

investigating officer.

Post on 7th April, 2010.

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioner will not be arrested

B.A. No. 1764 / 2010
2

until further orders in connection with Crime No.910

of 2009 of Nemom Police Station.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor that the

petitioner has complied with the direction contained in the order

dated 29/03/2010.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

her on bail on her executing bond for Rs.15,000/- with two

solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

A) The petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11 A.M.
on first Monday of every month, till the final
report is filed or until further orders;

B) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B.A. No. 1764 / 2010
3

C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence;

D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

E) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm