IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.20893 of 2011
Rajeev Kumar
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
02/- 19/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being
husband of the complainant has also filed an application under Section
9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking restitution of conjugal rights.
And to further, strengthen his intention, also ready to pay a sum of Rs.
1,000/- (One Thousand) per month by way of interim maintenance to
the complainant, subject to any order on the point by the competent
authority.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
subject to filing an application before the court below stating such
intention as stated above in the event of his arrest/surrender before the
court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Rajeev
Kumar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
(ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur,
in connection with Complaint Case No. 1044 of 2010, Tr. No. 2686 of
2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the
Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain
physically present before the court below on each and every date at
least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in
case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any
2
reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the
liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.
Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)