Rajendran vs State Bank Of India on 14 June, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 15861 of 2004(L)


1. RAJENDRAN, S/O.LAKSHMI, PUTHENVEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.MANOJ

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :14/06/2007

 O R D E R
                             PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

                  ..........................................................

                            W.P.(C)No.15861 OF 2004

                  ...........................................................

                      DATED THIS THE 14TH JUNE, 2007


                                   J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment.

2. As rightly pointed out by Mr.P.V.Surendran, Standing Counsel

for the respondent-Bank, the order of stay was refused to be extended

by this Court on the reason that the petitioner did not comply with the

conditions imposed by this Court for granting stay. The order vacating

stay was issued as far back as on 4th October, 2004. Under these

circumstances, this Court will not be justified in entertaining this Writ

Petition any longer. Even otherwise, a person who does not comply

with the conditions imposed by this Court for granting interim relief is

not entitled for favourable exercise of discretionary jurisdiction.

The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tg

WP(C)N0.15861/04

-2-

l

WP(C)N0.15861/04

-3-