High Court Kerala High Court

Rajendran vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Rajendran vs State Of Kerala on 14 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 5350 of 2009()


1. RAJENDRAN,S/O.REGHUNATHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :14/10/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                  ---------------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.5350 of 2009
                  ---------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 14th day of October, 2009




                               ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is

accused No.3 in Crime No.669 of 2009 of Varkala Police Station.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act.

3. The prosecution case is that on 16.8.2009, the

petitioner was found engaged in the sale of liquor without any

license in several huts constructed near a toddy shop. It is

alleged that food was also being supplied and several persons

were taking food and liquor. In the counter of the hotel, Indian

made foreign liquor of different brands were also seen. The

petitioner could not be arrested as he ran away on seeing the

police.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature and gravity of the offence and the allegations

made against the petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner

BA No.5350/2009 2

is not entitled to get the discretionary relief under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. If anticipatory bail is granted to

the petitioner, it would seriously affect the smooth and proper

investigation of the case.

The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl