High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rajesh Kumar & Ors vs The Union Of India & Ors on 2 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rajesh Kumar & Ors vs The Union Of India & Ors on 2 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      CWJC No.2074 of 2011
                   1.

Rajesh Kumar

2. Sanjay Shukla

3. Rakesh Pratap Yadav

4. Mohd. Asif Khan

5. Muktesa Mohammad Momin

6. Varshneya Prataph Narayan
…Petitioners
Versus

1. The Union of India through Secretary(Power) Shram
Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi

2. The Chief Managing Director, Power Grid Corporation of
India Sandamini Plot No.02, Sector-29 Gurgaon(Haryana)

3. The Executive Director, Human Resources Power Grid
Corporation of India Sandamini Plot No.02, Sector-29
Gurgaon(Haryana

4. The Deputy General Manager(HRs.) Power Grid
Corporation of India Ltd, Alankar Place, 5 th Floor, Boring
Road, Patna.

5. The Dy. Manager (HR) Power Grid Corporation of India
Ltd. Alankar Place 6th Floor, Boring Road Patna

6. The Personnel Officer, Power Grid Corporation of India,
Eastern Zone, H.Q. Alankar place, Boring Road, Patna
…Respondents

04. 02.08.2011 Heard counsel for the parties.

Petitioners seek to challenge the order dated

30.12.2010 (Annexure-7 series) , issued by the authority of the

Respondent-Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.(for short ‘the

Corporation’), whereby their services as Assistant Engineers on

contract basis in the Corporation have been disengaged and they

have been relieved.

It is agreed at Bar that the issue raised in this

application has already been considered by this Court in CWJC

No. 9198 of 2011(Mrigendra Srivstava & Ors. Vs. Power Grid

Corporation of India Ltd & Anr.).

Learned counsel for the petitioners, in that view of

the matter, states that petitioners would not be pressing the
2

relief(s) prayed for in this writ application. It is stated that

petitioners have not been paid their due salary/remuneration for

certain period(s) for which they have worked and, as such, the

Respondent-Corporation be directed to pay them their due

salary/remuneration.

Learned counsel for the Respondent-Corporation in

the light of the said stand taken by the petitioners, submits that

they may be granted opportunity to approach the Respondent-

Corporation by filing appropriate representation in this regard

which shall be considered in accordance with law and if there is

any due to be paid to the petitioners on account of

salary/remuneration for the period they have worked, the same

shall be paid to them.

Having heard the parties, the present application is

disposed of by the following order:

Let the petitioners file a detailed representation for
payment of their due salary/remuneration within three
weeks from today annexing therewith a copy of the
present order. The Respondents shall consider and
dispose of the said representation in accordance with
law within four weeks of its filing. If any amount on
account of salary/remuneration is found due and
outstanding, then the respondents shall ensure to release
payments thereof within four weeks of the disposal of
the said representation.

( Kishore K. Mandal )
hr