High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.9178 of 2011
                 RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE
                 SATYA SINGH
                                            Versus
                                 THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                          -----------

2. 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

By an order dated 16.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc.

21158 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail since two pistols

were recovered from his possession, but it was being rejected

at this stage.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody

since 29.12.2009 and he has fair antecedents.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Gaya

(Rail) P.S. Case No. 192 of 2009 subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the

cousin uncle of the petitioner namely Krishna Singh. The bailor

will undertake to furnish information to the court about any

change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other
2

case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of

similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali