Posted On by &filed under High Court, Patna High Court - Orders.


Patna High Court – Orders
Rajesh Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar on 9 August, 2010
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           Cr. Misc. No.20552 of 2010
                  RAJESH KUMAR SINGH son of Brahmdeo Singh
                                     Versus
                               STATE OF BIHAR
                                    -----------

4/ 09.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal

Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner is said to have specifically

caused injury to one Rajesh Kumar, who sustained simple injuries, and

he has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Majorganj

P.S. Case No.20 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i)That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about

any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and, if

he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii)That the bailors shall also

state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground

of misuse, (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will
-2-

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (v)That the petitioner will be well represented on

each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                    (Anjana Prakash, J.)
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.114 seconds.