High Court Kerala High Court

Rajesh V.R. vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rajesh V.R. vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4655 of 2010()


1. RAJESH V.R., AGED 35 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. RANJITHA C.S., AGED 28 YEARS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.RAJEEV

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :26/11/2010

 O R D E R
             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
            --------------------------
              Crl.M.C.No.4655 of 2010
            --------------------------

                       ORDER

Petitioner, the husband and second respondent,

the wife, are the accused and the defacto

complainant respectively in C.C.No.4057/2010 on the

file of Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court,

Irinjalakuda, taken cognizance for the offence

under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code on

Annexure-III final report. This petition is filed

under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to

quash the proceedings contending that entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably and

consequent to the settlement, it is not in the

interest of justice to continue the prosecution.

2. Second respondent appeared through a counsel

and filed an affidavit stating that entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably, along

with the other cases pending and consequent to the

settlement, it is not in the interest of justice to

CRMC 4655/10 2

continue the prosecution.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, second respondent and learned Public

Prosecutor were heard.

4. As held by the Apex Court in B.S.Joshi v.

State of Haryana ((2003) 4 SCC 675), when the

matrimonial disputes are settled amicably, it is

not in the interest of justice to stand on

technicalities and continue the prosecution. The

affidavit filed by the second respondent wife

establishes that she has settled all the

matrimonial disputes with the petitioner. In such

circumstances, it is not in the interest of justice

to continue the prosecution.

Petition is allowed. C.C.No.4057/2010 on the

file of Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court,

Irinjalakuda is quashed.

26th November, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv