High Court Kerala High Court

Rajesh vs The Branch Manager on 23 May, 2008

Kerala High Court
Rajesh vs The Branch Manager on 23 May, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34216 of 2005(W)


1. RAJESH, S/O. SADANANDAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. AMMINI AMMA, D/O. CHINNAMMA,

                        Vs



1. THE BRANCH MANAGER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. GOPINATHAN, S/O. KRISHNAPPILLAI,

3. RAJEEV,

4. REGHU,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.A.K.JOHN, ADDL.SC., KSFE LTD.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :23/05/2008

 O R D E R
                    C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                          -------------------------
                      W.P.(C) No. 34216 of 2005
                     ---------------------------------
                 Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2008

                             J U D G M E N T

First petitioner is, admittedly, the surety for the loan availed by

2nd respondent from KSFE. Petitioners’ case is that the property is in

the joint names of both the petitioners, 1st petitioner being the surety

and second petitioner, his mother. Obviously undivided right of the 1st

petitioner can be attached and sold in recovery proceedings. However,

since petitioner has a grievance that other sureties are not proceeded

against, I dispose of the writ petition with direction to petitioners to pay

50% of the arrear amount within a period of two months from now. If

50% is paid, then recovery will be continued by the recovery

authorities against other sureties for recovery of balance amount.

However, if the amount is not paid by the petitioners as above, then

the undivided right of the 1st petitioner in the property will be attached

and sold in recovery proceedings for recovery of the above amount. It

will be open to respondents to seek partition of the property, if so

required, and to sell share of 1st petitioner for settlement. Petitioners

will produce copy of the judgment for compliance. Nothing will stand in

the way of the recovery authorities for recovery against the principal

debtor and other sureties.

(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
jg