High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajinder Singh vs Haryana Power Generation Corpn. … on 4 August, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Rajinder Singh vs Haryana Power Generation Corpn. … on 4 August, 2008
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                CHANDIGARH.
                             Civil Writ Petition No.12546 of 2004

                                         Date of decision: 4.8.2008

     Rajinder Singh


                                                     -----Petitioner

                                Vs.

  Haryana Power Generation Corpn. Limited and others


                                                  -----Respondents
CORAM:-    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

           HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG

Present:   Mr. Ashwani Kumar Bura, Advocate for the petitioner.

           Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Addl.A.G.Haryana for the State.

           Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.3.


Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

This petition seeks quashing of order dated 9.7.2004,

Anenxure P.2 and for direction to consider the petitioner for

promotion to the post of Boiler Controller.

Case of the petitioner is that he joined as Plant

Attendant Grade II in the establishment of the respondents w.e.f

18.8.1988. He was promoted as Plant Attendant Grade-I w.e.f

16.10.1992. He passed diploma in Mechanical Engineering in June

1991. He was promoted as Operator II w.e.f 4.6.2001. He sought
Civil Writ Petition No.12546 of 2004 2

promotion to the post of Boiler Controller of which the post was

lying vacant. He filed CWP No.6633 of 2004 which was disposed

of on 23.4.2004 with a direction to decide the representation. The

representation was rejected on 9.7.2004.

In the reply filed, stand taken on behalf of respondent

No.3 is that the petitioner was working as Operator Grade I since

4.1.2005 but he was not eligible for promotion to the post of

Boilder Controller on his seniority. As per rule quoted in para 7 of

the reply, promotion could be given to the employees having four

years experience on the post of Operator Grade I or on the post of

Senior Operator depending upon two categories specified therein.

The petitioner having no experience as Senior Operator and his

experience as Operator Grade I being less than four years, he was

not eligible for promotion.

In view of above position, we are unable to issue a

direction for promotion of the petitioner. We record the statement

of learned counsel for the contesting respondents that the case of

the petitioner will be considered on his turn in accordance with

law.

The petition is disposed of.



                                             (Adarsh Kumar Goel)
                                                     Judge


August 4, 2008                               (Rakesh Kumar Garg)
'gs'                                                 Judge
 Civil Writ Petition No.12546 of 2004   3