Court No. - 51 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31337 of 2009 Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Raj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- S.K.Tiwari Respondent Counsel :- Govt Advocate Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the
record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely
implicated. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in
the present case co accused Sreesh Pandey, whose case stands on the same
footing, has been granted bail by this Court on 9.12.09 in Criminal Misc. Bail
Application No.32396 of 2009 and has claimed parity. This fact has not been
disputed by the learned A.G.A. He further submits that the applicant has no
criminal history and is in Jail since 7.10.09.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the
accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for
the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Rajneesh Kumar Raj involved in Case Crime No. 428 of
2009, under Section 420 IPC, P.S. Refinery, District Mathura be released on
bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following
conditions;
(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
(iv)The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week
of each month to show his good conduct and behavior.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at
liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 29.1.2010
vinay
