IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.24006 of 2011
Raju Kumar son of Ghura Yadav, resident of village-Mauare Khaira,
P.S. Baroon, District-Aurangabad.
..........Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar.
2. Guriya Devi W/o Raju Kumar, D/o Brahamdeo Yadav, R/o Village-
Mauar, Khaira, P.S.-Baroon, District-Aurangabad, at present Kurma
tola-Phulchandra Bigha, P.S. Jamhore, District-Aurangabad.
..............Opposite Party
-----------
02 12.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for
the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with
Baroon P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011 for the offences punishable under
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Aurangabad, is named accused in this case with allegation of demand of
dowry, torture etc.
Submission is that petitioner still intends to resume and
continue the matrimonial relationship with the informant with all due
dignity and care, who is his one and only wife. To further, strengthen
his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs 700/- (seven
hundred) per month to the informant by way of interim maintenance,
subject to any order on the point by the competent court.
Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, on the
event of filing of an application before the court below, clearly stating
such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender
before the court below within four weeks, let the above named
petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-
2
(ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection
with Baroon P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011, subject to condition laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional
condition to remain physically present before the court below on each
and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, which
ever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without
giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment,
the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.
(Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
Safik