IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 6"' DAY OF DECEMBER. 2?i'}*--1j0 THE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE AB Q BEFORE M. F. A. N0. 7304 QF"A204o9~B_(MVj'AV"1v}_ BETWEEN : RAJU, S/O NANJAIAH, . AGED ABOUT 29-" - Q' R/O HONAGANA}.~IA:LLI'L v1LLAr;»E,'*~H _ KASABA HOBLI, MANDYATQ. " . . . '*~v--i,;_--_'APPELLANT [By Sri AND AMRtJTH' s/0 D..1\/)2. PAPANNA-; ;' R,/O Do-QR'No.7'3, " 2&0 STAG E', ~ 3.8.12 MAM ROAD. GAYA"r§1R£pURAM, MYSORE} .19. _ MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE co. LTD.. DU', .M'USLI'M HOSTEL COMPOLEX. 1' .. 1871? MA;N ROAD. SARASVVATHIPURAM. '' ' MYSORE. ...RESPONDENTS {By Sri. O. Mahesh, Adv. for R2 Notice to R1 dispensed with) - 'H P:5l41;t~i'3$A; This MFA is filed U/S 17:3(1} of MV Act, .a"g--amsi the Judgement and award dated 28.7.2009 pas"s.ed.Vin MVC N0.218/2007 on the file of the Prl. _(Z._tvil.'Jndge (Sr.Dn.] and CJM and MACT, Mandya partly'falileivingg the claim petition for c0mpensati0nV___and'._1:seekingV enhancement of compensation. This appeal coining on fort Court delivered the fol1owi1'1Q.?_ it ' < JUDGMEgIsld This is a 1; I questlibning the correctness and legalitgref award passed in MVC by the Pri8ne1pal civil Mandya and seeking enhancem atibn. 2.lllfleardllltheleariled advocates appearing for the contended by the learned counsel for the compensation awarded by the tribunal is on thvefilower side and same is required to be enhanced .considering the medical evidence available on record gr/. and it is also contended that tribunal having noticed that claimant had suffered disability to the 35% to left upper limb, whole body have been taken at 17% and as--s'ue--hg the of' ' ; the }udgment and award passed is for. 4. Per contra ljlearned l -counsel for respondent/insurer judgment and award for dismissal of the that compensation awarded itselfi's.:on,llth:el"'higher side and claimant is not entitiedlllfarl enlianeiement in this appeal. Iflavlingvheard the learned advocates appearing ' and on perusal of the judgment and _l.pa_ss:ed by the tribunal as also the Tribunal records It would emerge that on 26~2~2007 at about 7 when the claimant was travelling in a Vehicle l lébearing No.KA 09 A 3420 on Mysore--Bangalore road the driver of the said Vehicle drove in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the boclyxgof a Trailer. On account of the said aectidentz-..t:1a1'ni'1ai1t sustained injuries and as such claim petition was filedu seeking compensation. On' aeeo1;int"._'o--fW1nju.y;ies sustained in the accident-.__in qiies'tionat'elairnant; admitted to District Hosptia1,"Mandya/,, 'C.asualit.y and on examination of ela.irr1«ant_Ai't_ by the treating doctors that .».eVlaim:ant..ijhadgg'=__siil"feredll the following injuries: _ llll tiff)' right elbow about l":'i2'.4).Vlt _ wound over the anterior A iliac spine. 2 (tié}__ Blttnltlinjuries to right hip # Iller 1/3"!' "femur. V.l.'i'*Vi5:;j'?l..:'uLacerated wound over the Right . V H forearm 5.3 1/2 om. V They suspected # and advised x-ray. X» ray taken confirmed the Comrnunited 1 subtrochanter # of rightfemur." To establish this fact claimant has produced wound certificate which is at Ex.P.4. Claimant on obta'i»ning treatment was clinically examined on P.W.2 and on such clinical and radiologir:e._l,,. :eXaIT1:in=.ati.oii-«.. of the claimant doctor noticed the fol.leoiviia.g{:4.,.l 4' V "{ 1'} Shortening -of the rioht {ii} Right side 1 aw Movesijients"llofifioltfi.2thelfig'ht"lhip & kneejoint V {iv} lexi,orL'».right* llimited about h'tp"joint limited about _ it d'e;@__8ues_ .. X~'rqy' shows fracture of femur united .ujf.thA 'thickening of callus. " On of said clinical and radiological eygaininationfioctor has opined that there was disability to of 35% to the right leg and 17% to the whole hody. Claimant was an inpatient. from 26e2~200'7 l."li.AA"t'o.._2:';3~3~2O07 as evidenced by the discharge card which at Ex.P.5. Tribunal while awarding compensation ac" 6 under the heading "medical expenses and conveyance and nourishment charges" has awarded a,V.su'rIi_V of Rs.6,O0O/M and Rs.5,OOO/M» respectively. admittedly produced medical billsas = . (21 bills] totaling a sum of ribs/»:¢;ve:;9, tribunal has awarded only-"Va'--surnllovf' that claim of the pe_titionerVj4_l:aizipears gaiorbitant. On examination of reconsideration of the eviden¢§'.t¢nderedh*.l§yVtheellairnialiitd as well as the doctor, I of:.t.T:i.eeonlsiderredlvvviewmthat an additional of to be awarded under this head it is awarded. .7. On" a,ccount"-of'; injuries sustained claimant has dis_abilitV3'}""ll as opined by doctor P.W.2 and is disability to the right leg to an extent of 3.50/o__"onafaecount of which claimant would not be able to___ disiehaige his normal duties and there would be "'::o'nsiderable loss of amenities in life which requires to %/V be suitably compensated and hence an additional sum of Rs.l0,000/- deserves to be awarded towa1'dvsVl'l.o:ss_ ogn amenities and accordingly same is awarded'.__§':"'*«.' L" V 8. P.W.2 the doctor has stated * to undergo one more operationlfor Tribunal considered said of Rs.4,000/-- towards on the lower side and and Rs.3,000/- if awarded wo'uld:1n__eet itlie' and it would be just and. As such an additioyndal _o.i-';lVlllV2fls.3,OOO/- is awarded under the l1ead..of---futVu1f_eniedical expenses. However, it is made clearhthat 'said amount would not carry any 'A.,_,mf'ereSE'f';:' 'l'l11}s, clairnant would be entitled in all for Rs.24,000/- by way of enhancement. ln"*view of above discussion, following order is it 3 4," ' Z I (i) (ii) ORDER
Appeal is allowed in part.
Judgment and award passed _4
213/2007 dated 28~_’_7:.2Q()9 “il3.3lzlllIl¢”1’i.n»Cipa_l}&V
Civil Judge (snout): ;%1od,iiied’-
additional c0mpensati’onl’of /’:3 ”
is awarded, out*–va.i,.Vof, which
Rs.3,OO0/,3 awarde’d future
medical earry any
interest andil ‘reIrial»ningl V eorripensation
awarded shall -ear1*yl”interefst at the rate
of date of claim
_A’petitieia;1__ lp3.._V,I’1″‘1l€I1′[ or deposit
_ wiiichever ‘isearlier.
.lr’1-s1i1ier”shall deposit the enhanced
Vvconipensavtion within a period of 6
-iveeks from the date of receipt of this
before jurisdictionai tribunal.
hlhe
additional compensation with
interest has to be released in favour of
the in View
claimant of marginal
in crease.
ax
9
(V) No order as to costs.
(vi) Registry to draw the award acc01″Ciir1.;<;{'&1_';/'% A'
[Vii] Registry to transmit_£h€._¢reCD.if:i$'
jurisdictional tribuna.1'f0:jthivi th;
Sbb/W