Gujarat High Court High Court

Raju vs State on 19 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Raju vs State on 19 April, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/4778/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 4778 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 2553 of 2009
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

RAJU
VIKRAMBHAI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR KARTIK PANDYA, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 11/04/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

Taking
into consideration the contents of the jail remarks, the applicant is
convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 397 and 34
of IPC, Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act and Section 25(1)(a) of
the Arms Act and the fact that the convict is not released so far
from the jail and the total period, he has undergone is only 1 year,
4 months and 12 days. Learned APP was requested to inquire whether
the convict will like to get himself released with police escort at
his own cost.

Learned
APP places on record a statement dated 9.4.2011 of the convict
wherein he has stated that his financial condition is not such which
will permit him to bear the expenses of police escort.

Taking
into consideration the aforesaid fact, the Court is of the opinion
that this is not a right time when the convict should be granted
temporary bail. Reason set out for temporary bail is also not
warranting grant of temporary bail. Hence, this application is
rejected.

(RAVI
R.TRIPATHI,J)

(P.P.BHATT,J)

pathan

   

Top