High Court Karnataka High Court

Raju vs The Divisional Controller N E K R T C on 16 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Raju vs The Divisional Controller N E K R T C on 16 September, 2009
Author: Lok Adalath

HIGH covm’ LEGAL SERVIQEs..COI£MiT§5E}§ L

cmcvrr BENCH AT Gr:L13A15:G;a

DATED THIS THE mm DAY§3;”+’ s:”:;?rEM8,E£¢,: ?2§)Q§ .

PREsEm f’%*V«%} –

HQNBLE 2.rrf~i%«Ji3s3′?ic£}5T.PAT:LL
% % % %
SKI. <3.S,Bxzéggggagflgrvi-BER,=

BETWEEN:

Efaifis V ….

S] 0. Shankaf Madmzmgv
Agec1aboui3{}ye-ars._. V’ ‘T ,
C/o.Ma:i11daragi G«undappa_fs. Ha1;’s::,'”
Near Vijaya Banigfl * ‘ _ 2 ” ,

Post Farfl:1a¥:_)ad, V V.

‘}”q and Big: Gzaalbargzi _ : Appeiiant

(B5; Sfliremath, Acivocate)

:vi£ Theilfififioaalflfinnvficr

.. :_
‘ “€}?;1iba3*~ga Divisian,

.GuIba;*ga. ‘ “‘

Thf: 1<:=;;:m'<::

‘ ‘ ..Ban’ga1ore, by its
‘ . _ 1 ‘ L fiivisicnal Contzroiier,
“‘V_§§”EKRTC, Guibmga

fjivisien, Gulbaxga.

3. Sri. Sanjeevkumar,

LJ

Driver of KSRTC Bus No. b

KA-3:2/ F-5′?9, ‘”

Depet No.1, KSRTC Bus Dfipot A.’ _ I ~
Gulbarga. V Respo:1rié11fs ”

(B3: Sm1:.Pree{i S.Mu1kundi, for
R–1 served) *

This }¢IisceIIa;1}z3ous’..}?i,ifsat A.pg)eé1}”.is”‘;€§E::d uncier Section
178(2) of the MQ.€:31’v..\fe1;:ici¢ _’z_~’:’1<;£4 'aaga_inSt':'tl1e Judgmcn.t and
award dated 1ti.22:T;20Q4«p;assedf 511" M'v'*<i:. No.453/2004 on
the file of tilt: "§£{ «ACi-€i}',__ I}'istIfii:t__{;'_1iE:3,ga and MACT, Gulbarga,
parity a1§owiI1g'i.fj:-gs clai111§"vL.petitiGIi§ for compezxsation and
seeking en2"1a:1§f§::i:mef1fi€, "of"eo'mpcr"1Sation.

Tl*:i§=_M". .I:o Lek Adalat, coming on for
co11ci1iati_on;,.._:hi#s day,"*th<: Adaiat: mada the foiIowing:~

A écmzxzzarron onngg

'&

._ :"V§:0_uf;séi for tha c}aima:r1t~app€fiant and

V17-::§3ré:séir:tativ€',* Vof "the: W I'€SpOI1d€fI1t-COI"pOI'ati{)i1 aieng with

' A.i.?;:3.*, Vycougseiére present.

2. The ciaixliani» appefiant being 119′: satisfiezii ‘i’i?i’i13Z}.

*»..;f§1e quantum csf campensafian awarded by the HE Add}. Dist

” Judge ané MAST, Gubiarga dated 17.12.2004 passed in

MVC F€a,453/ 20:34 hag prafarmd the above appeafi.

r3’)*”?

P

weeks, the said sum shall carry intc:;’e’st–at 1316 :8″?

aI1I111l’I1.

5.

The Judgment: fiziward by the
Tribunal, as regards deposit of €116
conlpansation amouzlt

Sci/-

JUDGE

3&1.

“Wm

per