High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rakesh Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar on 11 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Rakesh Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar on 11 October, 2010
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Cr.Misc. No.35707 of 2010
         RAKESH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE JAG MOHAN SINGH
                                Versus
                         STATE OF BIHAR
                               -----------

2. 11.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner

and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Sections 366 (A),

506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that initially a Sanha

was instituted about the disappearance of the

alleged victim in which no suspicion has been cast

against anyone where after 10 months later the

present complaint was instituted.

Considering the same, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

Addl. District Judge II, Siwan in connection with S.

Tr. No. 398/2010 arising out of Ander P.S. Case No.

81/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of

the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner
2

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about

any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in

the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That

the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will

receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date if he fails to do so on

two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

Fahad.                                 ( Anjana Prakash, J. )