IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.21785 of 2010
1. RAM BRIKSHA YADAV @ RAM BRIKSH YADAV S/O LATE RAGHO YADAV
2. SANTOSH YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV S/O RAM BRIKSHA YADAV
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners
and the State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case
instituted for the offence under Section 420 of the
Indian Penal Code.
Considering that the petitioners are in
custody since 10.04.2010 and the submission is
that it is a case of civil dispute between the parties,
let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail
on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five
thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Tiwari
the learned J.M., Ist Class, Gaya, in connection
with Tr. No. 794/09 arising out of complaint Case
No. 1165/08, subject to the conditions, (i) That one
of the bailors will be a close relative of the
petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving
genealogy as to how he is related with the
petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish
2
information to the court about any change in the
address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit
shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an
accused in any other case and, if they are, they
shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor
shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the
court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in
any other case of similar nature after his release in
the present case and thereafter the court below will
be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for
cancellation of bail on the ground of misuses, (iv)
That the petitioners will give an undertaking that
they will receive the police papers on the given date
and be present on date fixed for charge and if they
fail to do so on two given dates and delays and trial
in any manner, their bail will be liable to be
cancelled for reasons of misuse.
Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )