High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Ekbal Sharma vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 13 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Ekbal Sharma vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 13 July, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 MJC No.788 of 2011
                 Ram Ekbal Sharma, son of Late Surya Deo Sharma,
                 resident of village and Post Office - Bharthu, Police
                 Station-Ghoshi, District-Jehanabad State- Bihar, at present
                 Mohalla- Kautilya Nagar, Near Tara Apartment, North
                 Shashtri Nagar, Post Office- Shastri Nagar, Police Station-
                 Shashtri Nagar, Patna-23            ............... Petitioner
                                           Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar, through Mr. Anup Mukharjee, the
                    Chief Secretary, Bihar at Patna
                 2. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Secretary/Principal Secretary,
                    Building Construction Department, Vishweshwaraiya
                    Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna
                 3. Mr. Gopal Krishna, Engineer-in-Chief-cum- Additional
                    Commissioner-cum- Special Secretary, Building
                    Construction Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan,
                    Baily Road, Patna
                 4. Mr. Gopal Krishna, Chief Engineer (South), Building
                    Construction Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan,
                    Baily Road, Patna
                 5. Mr. Gopal Krishna, Chief Engineer-cum-President of
                    Departmental      Liability     Committee,     Building
                    Construction Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan,
                    Baily Road, Patna
                 6. Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Superintending Engineer, Building
                    Construction Department, Patna Building Circle, Patna
                 7. Mr. Arshad Alam, Executive Engineer, Building
                    Construction Department, Patna West Building
                    Division, Danapur, Patna ...............Respondents
                                        -----------

4. 13.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and learned counsel for the State.

From the show cause filed on behalf of

opposite party no.5, it appears that the order under

contempt has been complied with and the petitioner has

already received payment by cheque dated 17.6.2011.
2

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not

deny the said fact. However, he prays that liberty may

be granted to the petitioner to move the authorities

regarding payment of interest. The liberty is granted.

In the above circumstances, the contempt

application is dismissed.

S.Pandey                   ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)