IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.5759 of 2007(O&M)
Date of decision: January 22, 2009
Ram Jas ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
***
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has cut short the
entire controversy. He has stated that admittedly a post of Peon
is still lying vacant in the office of the respondent No.3 and thus
the petitioner could very easily be accommodated even without
uprooting the respondent No.5.
In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of
with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the feasibility
of posting the petitioner to the said vacant post sympathetically
and pass the necessary order within a period of two months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
January 22, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE