IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
LPA No.163 of 2010
RAM KISHORE PRASAD SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
For the appellant : Mr. Rajendra Lal Das, Advocate
For the State : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG 5,
Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG 5
For the State of Jharkhand: Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, Advocate
2 4.2.2011 The appellant moved this court in
C.W.J.C.No.15945 of 2009 for grant of time bound
promotion and also for certain benefits of A.C.P. By
the order dated 23.12.2009 the learned Single Judge
disposed of the writ application with an observation
that if the petitioner submits a representation, the
respondents would consider the same expeditiously.
The appellant is aggrieved by the part of the order
whereby the learned Single Judge also observed that
any order passed by the authorities on such
representation shall remain circumscribed by the
pronouncement of the Supreme Court in the case of C.
Jacob v. Director of Geology & Mining & anr), (2008)
10 SCC 115.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
the aforesaid decision would not be applicable in this
2
case as the same as passed in respect of an employee
whose services was terminated about 20 years ago.
Mr. P.K. Verma, learned A.A.G., 5 appears on
behalf of the State.
After having heard learned counsel for the
parties, we find that the learned Single Judge already
granted opportunity to the appellant to file
representation before the authorities concerned who
would dispose of the same expeditiously. We,
accordingly, dispose of this appeal with a direction that
if the appellant files a representation before the
authorities concerned, the same would be disposed of
in accordance with law.
(S.K.Katriar,J)
(S.P.Singh,J)
KHAN