Court No. - 52 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23950 of 2009 Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Sahu @ Pappu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- D.K. Singh,Umesh Vats Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and
perused the record.
The present criminal misc. bail application has been filed with the
prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.37 of
2007, under Section 8/18/20 N.D.P.S. Act, P.S. Barra, District
Kanpur Nagar.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was
falsely implicated in the present case. Even a complaint was
made by wife of applicant to the effect that he was lifted from his
house and subsequently he was falsely implicated in the present
case. In the present case, applicant is in jail since 02.02.2007.
The aforesaid prayer for bail was opposed by learned AGA on
the ground that it appears that there was gang of sale and supply
of contraband goods like charas because huge quantity of
Charas was recovered from the applicant and co-accused. There
was recovery of 7 kg. charas from the applicant and from other
co-accused recovery of charas was 10 kg., 5 kg., and 6 kg. Since
huge quantity was recovered hence there is no question of false
implication of applicant. If he will be released on bail there is
chances of repetition of similar activities. Hence applicant is not
entitled for bail.
In view of aforesaid facts, without expressing any opinion on
merit, it is not a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the application for
bail is rejected.
However, the trial court is expected to conclude the trial as
expeditiously as possible, preferably, within six months
Order Date :- 8.7.2010
Pramod
