High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Nandan Prasad Ray &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 9 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Nandan Prasad Ray &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 9 February, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CWJC No.8946 of 2010
                 1. RAM NANDAN PRASAD RAY S/O RAM AWATAR PRASAD
                 R/O VILL.- MURGAON, P.O.- IRPI, P.S. BELAGANJ, DISTT.-
                 GAYA
                 2. DHRUB NARAYAN PRASAD S/O SRI BIRA PRASAD R/O
                 VILL.- THEKAHA LAXMAN TOLA, P.O. THEKAHA BAZAR,
                 DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN
                 3. PREM CHAND SINGH S/O SRI MOSAFIR SINGH R/O VILL.-
                 KANDADIH, P.O.- GHOSIA KALA, DISTT.- ROHTAS
                 4. MADAN PRASAD S/O LATE PARSAN MAHTO R/O MOHALLA
                 BELBANAWA, WARD NO. 22, P.S. TOWN, P.O. MOTIHARI,
                 DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN
                 5. JOGENDRA PRASAD S/O JAGDISH PRASAD R/O MOHALLA
                 BELISARAI, P.O. MOTIHARI, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN
                 6. UMESH PANDIT S/O RAMESHWAR PANDIT R/O VILL.-
                 MADHOPUR DIH, P.O.- MADHOPUR, P.S. CHANDI, DISTT.-
                 NALANDA
                 7. NAWAL THAKUR S/O BISHU THAKUR R/O MURWI BIGAHA,
                 P.O. DIHARA, DISTT.- AURANGABAD
                                            Versus
                 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
                 DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, DISTT.- PATNA
                 3. DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICES GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA
                 4. DIRECTOR T.B.D.C. AGAM KUAN, PATNA
                                        -----------

02. 9.2.2011 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners are willing to move the concerned authority

i.e. Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, with their

claim for appointment in the background that so-called juniors from the

panel or recommended by the BPSC for the post of BCG Technician

have been appointed whereas their case has been ignored.

In case the petitioners move the authorities they will take

cognizance of their application, hear them if necessary and pass a

speaking order on their claim within a reasonable time preferably within

a period of four months from the date of production / communication of

this order. In this regard attention of the authorities may also be drawn
2

to the order dated 22.3.2004 contained in Annexure-5 to the writ

application passed in CWJC No.11461 of 2003.

The writ application is disposed of with above direction.

rkp                           ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)