High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Nath Choupal vs State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Nath Choupal vs State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Cr. Misc. No.22657 of 2010
             RAM NATH CHOUPAL, son of Sri Kari Choupal
                               Versus
                         STATE OF BIHAR
                              -----------

3/ 05.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Sections 302 and 379/34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

Considering that the only material against the

petitioner is confessional statement of the co-accused

and that he was last seen with the deceased, let the

petitioner above named, who is in custody since

06.02.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond

of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the

court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Baheri P.S.

Case No. 24 of 2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That

one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to
2

furnish information to the Court about any change in

address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any

other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail,

(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given

dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

Ashwini/                                 ( Anjana Prakash, J. )