High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Sewak Sahani @ Bhutwa Sahani @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Sewak Sahani @ Bhutwa Sahani @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Cr.Misc. No.20518 of 2010
      RAM SEWAK SAHANI @ BHUTWA SAHANI @ BHUTTA SAHANI,
                    S/o Late Fakirchand Sahani.
                               Versus
                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                              -----------

02. 16.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 395, 397 and 398 of

the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

Considering that the petitioner is not named

in the First Information Report nor was any

incriminating article was recovered from his

possession, let the petitioner, above named who is in

custody since 15.02.2010 be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at

Hajipur in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 42

of 2006 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That

one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor

will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any
2

change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in

the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two

given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on

two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-