IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.4652 of 2011
MADHAV SINGH @ MADHO SINGH SON OF LATE PARAS SINGH
RESIDNET OF VILLAGE- GUNDI, POLICE STATION- BARAHARA,
DISTRICT- BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. ......PETITIONER.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR .......OPPOSITE PARTY
with
Cr.Misc. No.5843 of 2011
RAMA SHANKAR YADAV SON OF LATE RANGILA YADAV, RESIDENT
OF VILLAGE- GUNDI, POLICE STATION- KRISHNAGARH, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR. ......PETITIONER.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ........OPPOSITE PARTY
-----------
2. 24.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners are in custody in relation to
Barahara (Krishnagarh) P.S. Case No. 232 of 2010
instituted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
The petitioner Madhav Singh is said to have
taking away the informant son and petitioner Ram
Shankar Yadav is said to have then killed him for
money that was paid by the petitioner, Madhav Singh
and Ram Shankar Yadav both have been charge-
sheeted.
In my view, I am not inclined to interfere in
the matter at this stage, however, if the trial is not
concluded within one year, subject to petitioner co
2
operating, the petitioner would be at liberty to move the
trial court for bail afresh.
Devendra/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)