Karnataka High Court
Ramamurthy vs Jayalakshmamma on 16 February, 2009
THIS wm’ PETITION COMING ON FOR FRE2LIMS–N”A$§’§’.V'””.,A
HEARING THIS BAY, THE comm’ MADE THE FOLLOWIN§3:–e . __ .: _ ‘
GRBER
The relief soaght in this Writ petifion;’_’is. ‘;for7:-_: 7/_A
to the Additional Civi} Judge (S;’if.§Z),1}) &L'(3JF.1,
dispose of the appeal in at
an early date. AA
2. It is seegrrnfifii a11d fmm the
contention the petitioner
that an birder passed by the
Leazncci magcipm V{5::§si1Aj;;mj.’ge:T13n) <35 JMFC, 'I'umkur in
o.s.No.2z0;s§f’ tfic Jto be presented ‘before the appropriate
‘ Though the Miscellaneous Agapeal is filed in the
and although the matter is being posted for
-healing, on several occasions, the same has not been taken
90/