IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SA.No. 131 of 2003()
1. RAMAN, VADAKKEPURAKKAL, THRIKULAM
... Petitioner
2. MANGELI, VADAKKEPURACKAL, THRIKULAM
Vs
1. VADAKKE PURAKKAL NOTTI, D/O.CHACHAN.
... Respondent
2. UNNIEECHI.
3. VADAKKEPURAKKAL UNNIAMAN'S CHILDREN
4. KUMARAN
5. VELAYUDHAN.
6. KARTHIYAYANI.
7. DEVAKI.
8. PARVATHI,
9. ARAMUGHAN,
10. VALLI, W/O.UNNIAMAN,
11. VADAKKE PURAKKAL KORU, S/O.RAMAN,
12. ARAMUGHAN, S/O.CHANDU,
13. KUMARAN,
14. KALI,
15. KALLIANI,
16. UNNIPPERI,
17. THANKA,
18. VADAKKE PURAKKAL SANKARAN'S CHILDREN
19. JANU,
20. THANKA,
21. SUBRAMANIAN,
22. GOPI (ALL ARE RESIDING AT TRIKKULAM
For Petitioner :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
For Respondent :SRI.RATHISH VIJAYENDRAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Dated :09/02/2009
O R D E R
K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------------
C. M. P. No.358 of 2003 and
S. A. No.131 of 2003
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009
JUDGMENT
C. M.P. No. No.358 of 2003
This is an application seeking for
condonation of delay of 2433 days in filing
the Second Appeal. Respondents 3 to 9 and 12
to 21 are served and they have entered
appearance also. All the same, respondents 1,
2, 10, 11 and 22 are reported dead as early as
on 19/03/04. Despite several opportunities
afforded, steps are not taken to implead the
L.Rs of respondents 1, 2, 10, 11 and 22. In
the circumstances, there is no purpose to be
served by retaining this C.M.P on file seeking
for condonation of delay of as much as 2433
days in filing this Second Appeal.
In the result, I dismiss this C.M.P.
S. A. No.131 of 2003 -2-
S.A. No.131/2003
C.M.P.No.358/03 seeking for condonation
of delay of as much as 2433 days in filing the
Second Appeal is dismissed today. The Second
Appeal is hence, hopelessly barred by
limitation.
In the result, I dismiss this Second
Appeal.
K.P.BALACHANDRAN,
JUDGE
kns/-