Ramanagouda vs Addl. Spl. Land Acquisition … on 7 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Ramanagouda vs Addl. Spl. Land Acquisition … on 7 August, 2009
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE mag czoum' OF KARNATAK_23"- 5   

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD  '  %

DATED mxs THE 7th DAYIQF   J 

BEFQRE«W

THE'. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE  N'iQ HAN SHAx§T5;NA{3£jLIDAR V

WRIT PERI?'-igorsg .tsi'Cxg,...Vjés4o39/ fidoé
AND 64()_f10]f?,(EQ*9 (LA_j-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. RAMAr§AG'QUi§.A; Am _€§8.j{EA--R$, '" 'V 
2. 1..AxMANAr;;<:_uDA, A/Ii'-63'YEARS, 

B<3'I'1ji.AI§?E1"S;j€3 I;~:§;:::vLe31*~:se5(3.t):IA Pg%;rIL,

3, BAsAPPA,A;A'.,63 Yfiéiiéfi,   

4. CHANDRA1"-'PA, AIA 51vvg;-39-,..*   
PET1T1oNERs3ANDin§~.R§;   '

as/0 RAMAPPA TE4,Oi..AMP~.'ifT£» _ 

ALL 5.22.3 AGRIG.§.ILT11RESTS; 

RIC) *'Z.~iAEs§2IHPxL 'w..Lmcsa, '  11111 ~ ~

Te. BELAGI, ~1.:::;s*:*._ BAC';AL}<1Q'F. .. PEETITONERS

1&3? SR1 R';:).':iE%Sp;:';i'z==_;§"v;';-,9
Amt} % J

"  *1§;i:«1:L. $91,. 1';A:_~_¢I"a:: ACQUESITION omega,
4: «NO .,UKF--.,_B1LAGi, mm: BAGALKOT'.

fmjaj :;§§2%i'E;:éAL MANAGER, LAND ACQUE$I'I'C1N um
 ezgvawgxaag, BAGALKOT. ., REESPGNDEZNTS

 Tggv,' $31" RK' HATT1, HCZGP}



2

THESE PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225-IAND
22? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING 'I'O.. DIRECT
RES.NC).1 TO PAY THE PETITIONERS INTEREST AT THE-. RATE

OF 9% FROM 5/9/2001 AND 19/11/2093 FOR "!'«Pl_f&R'.
AND AT THE RATE OF 15% THEREAFTER 'I'ILL.fi'HE IBFXTE OF' 
PAYMEBFF ON THE AWARDED AMOUNT OF_RS.'I,48--,2UGf« IN.'
RSPECT OF 2 ACRES 31 GUNTAS IN; SY,NO.36/i2VB*1IfJSOFAR AS I

PETETONERS NO. I AND 2 ARE CONCLERNED, 

THESE PETITIONS ARE coMi:ixtGI'+:)ixI F'()Ii'?€--vII3I+2~I33'i;iI§*k'.IN'fi:III€I"x'.VV

HEARING, THIS DAY THE COUR"I'4.__MADEA.TFiF5 FC'LL'£)?iQ(IVIII'IG§f:

Petitioners in V  -:@1V;I;I'Li{}nersIIIII133v<=: sought

for a»   Acquisition Qfficer
direcfing"  I'  on the compensation.

aWa._1'decIII31:I9°/pIfi{js11iI 05$/O9/2001 and 19/11/2003 for

 "  _  gear the rate Gf 15% till payment.

 The grievance of the petitioners is that they

 'si;at1.1t:)xy interest for the land ac:qm'rec¥ by

tfié reéfiéiédents. The prayer asf the petitioners is well

  ":'tm;:1<I¥éd inasmuch as the respondents have faileé to

statutory interesi in favr;-ur of the pefitiorzers in

Iflthe award. There carmot be any diszgnzzte that the

Y”

3

peiitioners are entitled to statutory iI1ter¢§;t—-iijQ:1fg”.j’

date 0f original award dated

petitioners are not awarded h: A’

following direction is issued:-

Respondent . L aw.%;né statutory
interest to 1(in respect
or2znugstéy§g§n§gy}§yj§;3§}2E)and.19/11/2003
(in QB} at the rate of

9% for (me at the rate of 15% pa

E Accdfdingly, the petitiozzs are allowed.

Sd/ –

* JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *